Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, yellow pond lily (Klamath) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, yellow pond lily (Klamath)
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, yellow pond lily (Klamath) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 34 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 72% more |
| Protein | 0.69 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 84% more |
| Carbs | 7.06 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 67% more |
| Fat | 0.35 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 82% more |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 18% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 10 mg | 7 mg ★ | Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, yellow pond lily (Klamath) has 43% more |
| Calcium | 23 mg ★ | 17 mg | Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, yellow pond lily (Klamath) has 35% more |
| Iron | 1.21 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 19% more |
| Potassium | 187 mg ★ | 172 mg | Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, yellow pond lily (Klamath) has 9% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.