Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, yellow pond lily (Klamath) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, yellow pond lily (Klamath)
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, yellow pond lily (Klamath) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 34 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more |
| Protein | 0.69 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Carbs | 7.06 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Fat | 0.35 g | 0.15 g ★ | Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, yellow pond lily (Klamath) has 133% more |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 10 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
| Calcium | 23 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Iron | 1.21 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Wocas, tuber, cooked, Oregon, yellow pond lily (Klamath) has 75% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 187 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.